亚马逊导购/好书推荐 
卑诗省当天新盘 
读新闻学外语
https://www.newsmax.com/world/globaltalk/israel-iran-nuclear-site/2025/06/24/id/1216227/
以色列官员称，在周日凌晨美国空袭之前，伊朗已将铀和其他设备从福尔多核设施转移，越来越多的证据表明，约880磅浓缩至60%纯度的铀被转移。
《纽约时报》援引两名了解情报的以色列官员的话报道，伊朗在特朗普威胁采取军事行动的情况下，转移了这些铀。这些铀的浓缩程度略低于制造核武器所需的90%。在空袭期间，福尔多核设施遭到掩体炸弹的袭击时，这些铀并不在福尔多核设施内。
国际原子能机构总干事拉斐尔·马里亚诺·格罗西表示，这些燃料原本位于伊朗古都伊斯法罕附近的另一个核设施内，在以色列开始对伊朗发动空袭的一周前，联合国核查人员曾在那里看到过这些铀。
格罗西周日告诉美国有线电视新闻网 (CNN)，“伊朗毫不掩饰他们保护了这些材料。”
据《纽约时报》报道，格罗西后来被问及他是否指这些库存被转移时回答说：“是的。”
据报道，这些库存储存在小型容器中，大约可以装进10辆汽车的后备箱。
以色列官员因涉及情报问题不愿透露姓名，表示福尔多核设施似乎并未遭到破坏，一位美国高级官员也承认了这一点。然而，这位美国官员表示，该设施已被“取除”。
与此同时，美国官员承认，他们不确定这些材料被转移到了哪里，但一位议员，俄克拉荷马州共和党参议员马克韦恩·穆林周一否认了这些材料被转移的说法，并表示福尔多核设施储存了更多铀，因为伊朗人“认为那里是安全的地方”。
但本月早些时候，伊朗声称其在“安全且无懈可击的位置”拥有另一个铀浓缩设施。专家认为，新设施位于库赫-埃科朗加兹拉山地下，这座山位于纳坦兹以南，海拔一英里（约1.6公里）。纳坦兹也是周日凌晨袭击的目标。
专家表示，如果这些铀浓缩材料位于新设施，其埋藏深度可能几乎是福尔多铀浓缩设施的两倍。
Israeli officials said Iran moved uranium and other equipment from the Fordo nuclear site before the U.S. airstrikes early Sunday, with growing evidence that about 880 pounds of uranium enriched to 60% purity was removed.
The New York Times, quoting two Israeli officials with knowledge of the intelligence, reported that the Iranians, with Trump’s threats to take military action, moved the uranium, which was enriched to just below the 90% rate used in nuclear weapons, was not in the Fordo site when it was hit in a salvo of bunker-buster bombs during the airstrikes.
Instead, the fuel had been within another nuclear complex near the ancient Iranian capital of Isfahan, where it was seen by teams of United Nations inspectors a week before Israel started its airstrikes on Iran, said Rafael Mariano Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Grossi told CNN Sunday that “Iran has made no secret that they have protected this material.”
Later, Grossi, when asked if he meant that the stockpile was moved, he replied, “I do,” reported The Times.
The fuel stockpile reportedly is stored in small containers, fitting in the trunks of about 10 cars.
The Israeli officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters, said that it did not appear that the Fordo site was destroyed, which a senior U.S. official acknowledged. However, the U.S. official said that the site was taken “off the table.”
Meanwhile, U.S. officials concede that they are not certain about where the material was reportedly moved, although one lawmaker, Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., on Monday denied that the materials were moved and said that more uranium had been stockpiled at the Fordo facility because the Iranians “thought it was a safe place to be.”
But earlier this month, Iran claimed it had another enrichment site “in a secure and invulnerable location,” with experts believing the new site is under Kuh-e Kolang Gaz La, a mountain a mile above sea level located south of Natanz, a site also targeted in the early Sunday raids.
If the material is at the new site, it could be buried almost twice as deep as it would have been at Fordo, according to experts.
