https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/04/where_are_the_men.html
In March 1964, the New York Times reported that dozens of people heard the anguished cries of 29-year-old Kitty Genovese 状语从句as she was raped and murdered outside her Queens, New York, apartment but they did nothing. The Times was lying. The lie worked, though, 状语从句because we’ve also seen things happen 状语从句when people should have intervened to stop something but refrained. Now, thanks to ubiquitous smartphones, we’re seeing that, in 2021, there’s an epidemic of passive Americans watching tragedy strike.
Many of us have seen recent videos 定语从句in which something terrible happens and bystanders capture the event on an iPhone or other devices. The carjacking of an Uber driver, and his subsequent death at the hands of two teenage girls in DC, the vicious beating of an Asian man on a New York subway, and the ghastly assault of an elderly Asian woman in New York – all have shocked the senses of a country nearly numb from a constant stream of appalling images.
These events have several things in common: They take place in public spaces, are witnessed by other people, and are recorded on digital devices. The most important thing 定语从句these events have in common is 表语从句that no one stepped up to stop the aggressor. In all three events, people watched as an innocent person was savagely attacked and no one lifted a finger to intercede, except to lift their phones and hit “record.”
In 1964, 分词状语believing the Times to be truthful, the public was outraged that a young woman could be raped and murdered within earshot of dozens of her neighbors and no one would come to her assistance. Now we view a video of naked violence without pausing to consider who recorded it and why? Who was present? Where is the outrage? Where were the men?
There are myriad explanations for 名词从句why men are impotent in these situations. It could be that men are less virile, as is evident in falling testosterone levels. It could be fear of litigation; of being sued by the criminal. It could be the absence of actual empathy, from real human contact, as opposed to “virtual” empathy, 分词定语gained from watching digital media. It could be simple fear.
Perhaps it is none of the things listed above; perhaps it is something deeper and much more damaging. Maybe we have lost sight of Truth; the idea 同位语从句that there is a universal right and wrong. Instead of a shared concept of good and evil, we now have billions of individual worlds of relativity. Each of us constructs a reality not based on good and evil, but rather on a spectrum ranging from pleasant to unpleasant.
状语从句When we see a fellow passenger on the subway savagely beaten, we find it unpleasant and hit record to share the unpleasantness with others. 状语从句When we see two girls carjacking an uber driver we record the unpleasantness for our Twitter followers. 状语从句When we see an elderly woman beaten to the pavement and kicked in the head, we have more unpleasantness to post on Facebook.
Men, in these situations, should not post on Facebook or Twitter. They should not be recording at all. Men should be acting. Men should know 宾语从句what is good and what is evil and act accordingly. But in a virtual and relative world, men do not act; they experience and share those experiences via a post to social media. It is 表语从句as if the act of recording and posting the videos is to form a consensus on the unpleasantness of the event and to develop a sense of outrage. But outrage is feeling, not an action.
There is a theory in moral philosophy, emotivism, 定语从句which proposes that moral claims within a statement can be reduced to the expression of feelings; that there is no moral value outside of how an individual feels. 状语从句When we witness an act of evil in the emotivism framework, the nature of the evil is reduced to a feeling and the imperative to act is obscured. This explains why we see evil acts perpetrated in the presence of passive men 定语从句who do nothing to intercede.
Emotivism blends well with our contemporary culture. Woke-ism and emotivism combine to define a culture devoid of moral imperatives based on good and evil, and instead only require a consensus of feelings. Thus, we can burn down businesses in dozens of cities 状语从句when a police officer kills a (former) felon by holding his knee to the suspect’s shoulder blades because we have formed a consensus of outrage. The murder of the Uber driver, the beatings of the Asian man on the subway, and the beating of the Asian woman on the street lack consensus, and therefore no action is required.
Men do not step up 状语从句because they no longer recognize good and evil. The men are still around us, but they have been emasculated by their feelings.
Chris Boland can be reached at cboland7@outlook.com.
Follow Me 👉🏿
